From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. DoorDash, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Nov 16, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-16-2255 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 16, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-16-2255

11-16-2017

DEWEY EDWARDS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DOORDASH, INC., Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation dated October 18, 2017, and Plaintiff's objections thereto, the court is of the opinion that said Memorandum and Recommendation should be adopted by this court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommendation is ADOPTED by this court.

The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to the respective parties.

SIGNED at Houston, Texas, this 16th day of November, 2017.

/s/_________

SIM LAKE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Edwards v. DoorDash, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Nov 16, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-16-2255 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Edwards v. DoorDash, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DEWEY EDWARDS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Nov 16, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-16-2255 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 16, 2017)

Citing Cases

Ridge Natural Res., L.L.C. v. Double Eagle Royalty, L.P.

In the only case Double Eagle cites to support its contention that the venue provision here is substantively…

Ridge Nat. Res., L.L.C. v. Double Eagle Royalty, L.P.

See Edwards v. Doordash, Inc., No. CV H-16-2255, 2017 WL 5514302, at *1, *6 (S.D.Tex. Oct. 18, 2017),…