Opinion
Case No.: 2:18-cv-01998-APG-BNW
10-15-2020
FRANCINE EDWARDS, Plaintiff v. CONN APPLIANCES, INC., et al., Defendants
Order Accepting Report and Recommendation
[ECF No. 159]
On September 30, 2020, Magistrate Judge Weksler granted in part plaintiff Francine Edwards' motion to amend to the extent Edwards withdrew her claim under 47 U.S.C. § 227(c)(5). Judge Weksler recommended that I deny Edwards' motion to amend to add a claim under the Nevada Deceptive Trade Practices Act. ECF No. 159.
Edwards did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)).
I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler's report and recommendation (ECF No. 159) is accepted. Plaintiff Francine Edwards' motion to amend (ECF No. 133) is granted in part and denied in part as set forth in Judge Weksler's report and recommendation.
DATED this 15th day of October, 2020.
/s/_________
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE