From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edward v. Swingle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 11, 2012
No. CIV S-10-0979-JAM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0979-JAM-CMK-P

01-11-2012

MEL TYRONE EDWARD, Plaintiff, v. D. SWINGLE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 9, 2011, the court directed defendant Medina to show cause why the United States Marshal's request for reimbursement of costs of personal service should not be granted. Defendant Medina filed his response on January 6, 2012. In his response, defendant Medina notes that the United States Marshal submitted a return of service indicating that personal service had been effected on an individual named Derek Bunnell. Because the costs incurred by the United States Marshal were not done so to effect service on defendant Medina, the request for reimbursement of service costs will be denied and the order to show cause will be discharged.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The United States Marshal's request for reimbursement of service costs (Doc. 34) is denied; and

2. The December 9, 2011, order to show cause is discharged.

___________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Edward v. Swingle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 11, 2012
No. CIV S-10-0979-JAM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Edward v. Swingle

Case Details

Full title:MEL TYRONE EDWARD, Plaintiff, v. D. SWINGLE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 11, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0979-JAM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2012)