From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edward v. Scarsella

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 31, 2008
No. CIV S-03-02584 ALA P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-02584 ALA P.

January 31, 2008


ORDER


Pending before this court is the court's December 21, 2007, order for appointment of counsel for the plaintiff.

On January 6, 2004, plaintiff Mel Edward filed a motion requesting appointment of counsel. On July 19, 2004 the Magistrate Judge assigned to this matter referred the case to the University of California, King Hall Civil Rights Clinic for review. On June 23, 2005, the Magistrate Judge withdrew the referral of this matter from the University of California, King Hall Civil Rights Clinic. On August 3, 2007, the court denied defendant's motion for summary judgment.

On August 13, 2007, this court first attempted to appoint counsel for plaintiff. However, the court was informed that appointed counsel was unavailable. On December 21, 2007, this court again attempted to appoint counsel for plaintiff. That counsel informed the court that she would not be able to accept the appointment due to a conflict.

Finally, this court has now located counsel for appointment. Thus, upon review of the file and good cause appearing therefor, the court finds as follows:

Efforts to obtain legal representation without order of this court would be futile;

1. Plaintiff's income is 125 percent or less of the current poverty threshold established by the Office of Management and Budget of the United States and is otherwise without resources to obtain counsel;

2. This case is of a type that attorneys in this district ordinarily do not accept without prepayment of a fee;

3. This case is not a fee generating case within the meaning of California Business and Professions Code § 8030.4(g); and

4. This case has sufficient merit to warrant appointment pursuant to General Order No. 230.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The court hereby appoints Thomas Rector of Jones Day, 555 California Street, 26th Floor, San Francisco, California, 94104-1500 to undertake representation of the plaintiff through pretrial proceedings and through trial;

2. Mr. Rector is directed to contact the Clerk's Office to make arrangements for copies of the file;

3. Mr. Rector shall submit all deposition transcript costs for payment pursuant to § 8030.6 of the California Business and Professions Code. All other contemplated costs shall be handled as described in General Order No. 230;

4. A status conference is set for this matter on February 27, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. via teleconference. A separate minute order will issue addressing the teleconference; and

5. Ms. Bunzel, is terminated as counsel for plaintiff.


Summaries of

Edward v. Scarsella

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 31, 2008
No. CIV S-03-02584 ALA P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2008)
Case details for

Edward v. Scarsella

Case Details

Full title:MEL TYRONE EDWARD Plaintiff, v. S. SCARSELLA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 31, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-03-02584 ALA P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2008)