From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

EDSTROM v. NDEX WEST, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 23, 2010
CIV. NO. S-10-105 FCD/KJM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2010)

Opinion

CIV. NO. S-10-105 FCD/KJM.

November 23, 2010


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before the court on plaintiffs Daniel and Teri Edstrom's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint ("SAC") adding additional defendants. (Docket #27.) Finding good cause to permit the amendment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), and considering that no opposition was filed to the motion, the court HEREBY GRANTS plaintiffs' motion. Plaintiff shall file and serve an SAC within 20 days of the date of this Order; the SAC shall comply with both the instant order and the court's previous order of October 18, 2010 (Docket #40), dismissing defendants ACS and MERS. Defendants, including NDEX, shall have 30 days after service of the SAC to file their response thereto.

Plaintiffs also sought leave to file a SAC to assert facts establishing a basis for application of equitable tolling with regard to their claims asserted against defendants America's Servicing Company ("ASC") and Mortgage Electronic Registration System ("MERS"). The court previously ruled on plaintiffs' motion on that issue as it related to ASC and MERS' previously pending motion to dismiss. (Docket #40.) The court granted ASC and MERS' motion to dismiss without leave to amend, leaving defendant NDEX, West, LLC ("NDEX") as the sole remaining defendant. Thus, now pending is only whether plaintiffs should be permitted leave to amend to name additional defendants.

Because oral argument will not be of material assistance, the court orders this matter submitted on the briefs. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g).

On October 6, 2010, NDEX filed an answer to plaintiff's proposed SAC, filed September 30, 2010 (Docket #33). However, the court had not yet granted plaintiffs leave to file a SAC; as such, the court construes NDEX's answer (Docket #38) as a response to plaintiff's first amended complaint. NDEX may respond to plaintiffs' SAC in accordance with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 23, 2010


Summaries of

EDSTROM v. NDEX WEST, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 23, 2010
CIV. NO. S-10-105 FCD/KJM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2010)
Case details for

EDSTROM v. NDEX WEST, LLC

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL MAJOR EDSTROM, and TERI ANNE EDSTROM, Plaintiffs, v. NDEX WEST…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 23, 2010

Citations

CIV. NO. S-10-105 FCD/KJM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2010)