From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edry v. Hometown Equity Mortg.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 14, 2023
2:22-cv-00804-MMD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 14, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00804-MMD-VCF

02-14-2023

IDAN U. EDRY, an individual, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. HOMETOWN EQUITY MORTGAGE, LLC, a Missouri limited-liability company, D/B/A THELENDER, Defendants.

McDONALD CARANO LLP Kristen T. Gallagher (NSBN 9561) McDONALD CARANO LLP, Matthew P. Previn (admitted pro hac vice) PAUL HASTINGS LLP, Michael Morrill (admitted pro hac vice) PAUL HASTINGS LLP Attorneys for Defendant Hometown Equity Mortgage LLC d/b/a theLender WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP Royi Moas (NSBN 10686) Daniel Bravo (NSBN 13078), Jason J. Thompson (admitted pro hac vice) Kevin J. Stoops (admitted pro hac vice) David R. Parker (admitted pro hac vice) SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff Idan U. Edry and Putative Class Members


McDONALD CARANO LLP Kristen T. Gallagher (NSBN 9561) McDONALD CARANO LLP, Matthew P. Previn (admitted pro hac vice) PAUL HASTINGS LLP, Michael Morrill (admitted pro hac vice) PAUL HASTINGS LLP Attorneys for Defendant Hometown Equity Mortgage LLC d/b/a theLender

WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP Royi Moas (NSBN 10686) Daniel Bravo (NSBN 13078), Jason J. Thompson (admitted pro hac vice) Kevin J. Stoops (admitted pro hac vice) David R. Parker (admitted pro hac vice) SOMMERS SCHWARTZ, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff Idan U. Edry and Putative Class Members

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO ANSWER PLAINTIFF'S CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

(FIRST REQUEST)

Defendant Hometown Equity Mortgage LLC d/b/a theLender (“theLender” or “Defendant”) and plaintiff Idan U. Edry (“Edry” or “Plaintiff”), by and through their attorneys, hereby agree, stipulate and respectfully request that the Court extend the deadline for theLender to answer Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) from February 14, 2023, up to and including February 24, 2023. On January 31, 2023, the Court entered an Order granting in part and denying in part theLender's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 34); therefore theLender's answer or other response to the Complaint is currently due by February 14, 2023. Good cause exists for the extension as the parties agree to permit theLender additional time to prepare its answer. This is the first request to extend the deadline.

This request is being made in good faith and is not brought to delay litigation or prejudice any party. Therefore, the parties respectfully request that theLender's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint be extended from February 14, 2023, up to and including February 24, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Edry v. Hometown Equity Mortg.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 14, 2023
2:22-cv-00804-MMD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Edry v. Hometown Equity Mortg.

Case Details

Full title:IDAN U. EDRY, an individual, on behalf of himself and others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 14, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00804-MMD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 14, 2023)