Opinion
No. 3D20-1156
08-25-2021
Rodlin EDOUARD, et al., Appellants, v. Wood TAVERN, Inc., etc., Appellee.
Law Offices of Levy & Levy, P.A., and Chad E. Levy (Sunrise), for appellants. Recalde Law Firm, P.A., and Rafael Recalde and Geremy Klein, for appellee.
Law Offices of Levy & Levy, P.A., and Chad E. Levy (Sunrise), for appellants.
Recalde Law Firm, P.A., and Rafael Recalde and Geremy Klein, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Valenzuela v. GlobeGround North Am., LLC., 18 So. 3d 17, 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (explaining that after the employer provides a legitimate reason for the termination, the employee "must present significantly probative evidence on the issue [of pretext] to avoid summary judgment" and that "conclusory general assertions, however, do not create factual issues necessary to avoid summary judgment") (internal citations and quotations omitted).