Opinion
08-26-2013
EMMANUEL EDOKOBI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC.; BARCLAYS BANK, PLC, Defendants - Appellees, and GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.; AVELO MORTGAGE, L.L.C.; DEUTSCHE BANK AG; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; REAL TIME RESOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants. EMMANUEL EDOKOBI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.; AVELO MORTGAGE, L.L.C.; DEUTSCHE BANK AG; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; REAL TIME RESOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants - Appellees, and BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC.; BARCLAYS BANK, PLC, Defendants.
Emmanuel Edokobi, Appellant Pro Se. David Block Bergman, ARNOLD & PORTER, LLP, Washington, DC; Nicholas M. DePalma, VENABLE, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Daniel J. Tobin, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Washington, DC; Bizhan Beiramee, MCGINNIS WUTSCHER BEIRAMEE, LLP, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (8:13-cv-00288-JFM) Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emmanuel Edokobi, Appellant Pro Se. David Block Bergman, ARNOLD & PORTER, LLP, Washington, DC; Nicholas M. DePalma, VENABLE, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Daniel J. Tobin, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Washington, DC; Bizhan Beiramee, MCGINNIS WUTSCHER BEIRAMEE, LLP, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Emmanuel Edokobi appeals the district court's orders denying his motion to remand, denying his motion to disqualify, and granting Defendants' motions to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Edokobi v. Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc.; Edokobi v. Greenpoint Mortg. Funding, Inc., No. 8:13-cv-00288-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 28, Mar. 14 & Mar. 29, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED