Edney v. Estock

Full title: ORLANDO EDNEY, Petitioner, v. LEE ESTOCK, et al., Respondents.

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 2, 2021

Civil Action 19-4456 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 2, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 19-4456

09-02-2021

ORLANDO EDNEY, Petitioner, v. LEE ESTOCK, et al., Respondents.

JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

ORDER

JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of September 2021, upon consideration of the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 1), Petitioner's Motion to Compel Philadelphia County District Attorney Pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. § 549 (Doc. No. 24), the pertinent record, and upon review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Elizabeth T. Hey (Doc. No. 25) to which no objections have been filed, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 25) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED.

3. Petitioner's Motion to Compel Philadelphia County District Attorney Pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. § 549 (Doc. No. 24) is DENIED.

4. The Court finds that Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right and accordingly a certificate of appealability shall not issue.