From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edmund D. Cook, Inc. v. Commercial Cas., c., Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 22, 1937
190 A. 102 (N.J. 1937)

Opinion

Submitted October 30, 1936 —

Decided January 22, 1937.

On appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court.

For the appellant, William A. Moore.

For the respondent, Hervey S. Moore.


Such of the grounds of appeal as exhibit claimed errors of law in the judgment under review are without substance. As to these, it suffices to say that Judge Oliphant properly construed the condition of the bond in suit. And there was evidence of a breach.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Edmund D. Cook, Inc. v. Commercial Cas., c., Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 22, 1937
190 A. 102 (N.J. 1937)
Case details for

Edmund D. Cook, Inc. v. Commercial Cas., c., Co.

Case Details

Full title:EDMUND D. COOK, INCORPORATED, A BODY CORPORATE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 22, 1937

Citations

190 A. 102 (N.J. 1937)
190 A. 102