From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edmonson v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 30, 2010
79 A.D.3d 1547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 509102.

December 30, 2010.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Cahill, J.), entered February 22, 2010 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Samuel Edmonson, Elmira, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Malone Jr. and Garry, JJ.


Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting possession of weapons and contraband. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting petitioner's appeal. We have been advised by the Attorney General that, during the pendency of this appeal, the determination at issue was administratively reversed and all references thereto expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Petitioner has accordingly received all the relief to which he is entitled, and the appeal is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Watson v Fischer, 73 AD3d 1303, 1303-1304; Matter of Mercer v Artus, 70 AD3d 1073, 1073-1074).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.


Summaries of

Edmonson v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 30, 2010
79 A.D.3d 1547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Edmonson v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SAMUEL EDMONSON, Appellant, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 30, 2010

Citations

79 A.D.3d 1547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 9594
912 N.Y.S.2d 919

Citing Cases

Marcial v. Fischer

Although petitioner also seeks to be reassigned to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary…

In the Matter of Vincent Vanness v. Fischer

The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…