From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edmonds v. Ziegler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Jan 29, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-cv-01374 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 29, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-cv-01374

01-29-2014

STEVEN E. EDMONDS, Petitioner, v. JOEL ZIEGLER, Warden, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Petitioner's December 13, 2010 Application Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State or Federal Custody (Document 1).

By Standing Order (Document 3) entered on December 13, 2010, this action was referred to the Honorable R. Clarke VanDervort, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 8, 2014, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 10) wherein it is recommended that this Court dismiss the Petitioner's Application and remove this matter from the Court's docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by January 27, 2014.

Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the Petitioner's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Petitioner's Application Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State or Federal Custody (Document 1) be DISMISSED and that this matter be REMOVED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge VanDervort, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

__________

IRENE C. BERGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA


Summaries of

Edmonds v. Ziegler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Jan 29, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-cv-01374 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 29, 2014)
Case details for

Edmonds v. Ziegler

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN E. EDMONDS, Petitioner, v. JOEL ZIEGLER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION

Date published: Jan 29, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-cv-01374 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 29, 2014)

Citing Cases

Ray v. Masters

This court previously considered a similar case in which a petitioner claimed that he should not be held…

Purnell v. Warden, Bennettsville Fed. Corr. Inst.

(finding that despite a petitioner's claim that he did not possess the tools necessary to retrieve the weapon…