Edmonds v. Terhune

Full title: EUGENE EDMONDS, Petitioner, v. C.A. TERHUNE, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 6, 2008

No. CIV S-08-0281 JAM KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-0281 JAM KJM P.

October 6, 2008

ORDER

JOHN MENDEZ, District Judge

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 28, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 28, 2008, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.