From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edmonds Dental Co. v. Keener

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 25, 2014
449 S.W.3d 792 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

WD 76867

2014-11-25

Edmonds Dental Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Elbert Keener, III and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.

Paul W. King, Springfield, MO and Richard L. Rollings, Jr., Camdenton, MO, for appellant.Elbert L. Keener, III, Pro Se, Harrison, AR; Bart A. Matanic, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Paul W. King, Springfield, MO and Richard L. Rollings, Jr., Camdenton, MO, for appellant. Elbert L. Keener, III, Pro Se, Harrison, AR; Bart A. Matanic, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Four: Alok Ahuja, C.J., Cynthia L. Martin, J. and Wayne P. Strothmann, Sp. J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM:

Edmonds Dental Company (“EDC”) appeals a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which held that Elbert Keener was not disqualified for unemployment benefits, because EDC had failed to prove that he was discharged for misconduct connected with work. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Edmonds Dental Co. v. Keener

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 25, 2014
449 S.W.3d 792 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Edmonds Dental Co. v. Keener

Case Details

Full title:Edmonds Dental Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Elbert Keener, III and…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Nov 25, 2014

Citations

449 S.W.3d 792 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)