From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edison v. Perlbinder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 14, 1946
271 App. Div. 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

October 14, 1946.


Appeal by defendants from an order denying their motion to resettle a proposed case on appeal by striking therefrom the record of a separate and distinct proceeding in contempt that grew out of the trial of the action. Order reversed on the law, without costs, and the motion granted, without costs. The record of a separate and distinct proceeding is not a proper part of the record on appeal from a judgment. ( Wierichs v. Innis, 32 Misc. 462, affd. 56 App. Div. 625; 6 Carmody on New York Pleading and Practice, § 243.) Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Lewis, P.J., not voting.


Summaries of

Edison v. Perlbinder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 14, 1946
271 App. Div. 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Edison v. Perlbinder

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS EDISON et al., Respondents, v. JULIUS PERLBINDER et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 14, 1946

Citations

271 App. Div. 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

Otero v. Woodbine Cab Corp.

It was not a separate proceeding. (Cf. Edison v. Perlbinder, 271 App. Div. 794. ) Nolan, P.J., Carswell,…