From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edgeworth v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 4, 1936
168 So. 869 (Ala. 1936)

Opinion

8 Div. 714.

June 4, 1936.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; A. E. Hawkins, Judge.

H. T. Foster, of Scottsboro, for appellant.

Proctor Snodgrass, of Scottsboro, for appellee.


It is questionable if the appellant's brief sufficiently complies with Supreme Court Rule 10 so as to warrant the consideration of this appeal. We find, however, that there was no objection or exceptions to the rulings referred to in the assignments of error, save the general conclusion or judgment of the court who tried the case without a jury. As to this sole exception, there is no argument in appellant's brief pointing out why the conclusion or judgment was erroneous.

The judgment of the circuit court is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

THOMAS, BROWN, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Edgeworth v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 4, 1936
168 So. 869 (Ala. 1936)
Case details for

Edgeworth v. Hicks

Case Details

Full title:EDGEWORTH v. HICKS

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jun 4, 1936

Citations

168 So. 869 (Ala. 1936)
232 Ala. 468

Citing Cases

Malone v. Protective Life Ins. Co.

Cabaniss Johnston, of Birmingham, and O. R. Hood and Roger C. Suttle, both of Gadsden, for appellee.…