From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edgecomb v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 21, 2013
118 So. 3d 220 (Fla. 2013)

Opinion

No. SC13–298.

2013-06-21

Robert EDGECOMB, Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla.2000).

LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Edgecomb v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 21, 2013
118 So. 3d 220 (Fla. 2013)
Case details for

Edgecomb v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert EDGECOMB, Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Jun 21, 2013

Citations

118 So. 3d 220 (Fla. 2013)