From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edgar v. General Electric Company

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 5, 2002
Civil Action No. 3:00-CV-2729-D (N.D. Tex. Mar. 5, 2002)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:00-CV-2729-D

March 5, 2002


ORDER


The March 1, 2002 motion for nonsuit of defendant-third-party plaintiff Deere and Company ("Deere") is denied without prejudice to its moving for relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). A nonsuit is a procedural device recognized by a Texas, not federal, procedural rule. In federal court, there is no virtually-unlimited right to take a nonsuit. Instead, where, as here, the party to be dismissed has already answered, the party who seeks dismissal must file a motion to dismiss under Rule 41(a)(2). The motion must also contain a certificate of conference. Accordingly, Deere's March 1, 2002 motion for nonsuit is denied without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Edgar v. General Electric Company

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 5, 2002
Civil Action No. 3:00-CV-2729-D (N.D. Tex. Mar. 5, 2002)
Case details for

Edgar v. General Electric Company

Case Details

Full title:DANA EDGAR, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant, and DEERE…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Mar 5, 2002

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:00-CV-2729-D (N.D. Tex. Mar. 5, 2002)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Moss Law Firm, P.C.

A "nonsuit" is a procedural device recognized by Texas law that is roughly equivalent to a voluntary…

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Faulkner

A "nonsuit" is a procedural device recognized by Texas law that is roughly equivalent to a voluntary…