From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edgar v. Citraro

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Dec 16, 1929
102 Cal.App. 796 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)

Opinion

Docket No. 7225.

December 16, 1929.

MOTION to dismiss appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Edward P. Shortall, Judge. Motion granted.

Cooley, Crowley Gallagher and E.D. Keil for Appellant.

Vincent W. Hallinan and Felix N. Cunningham for Respondents.


THE COURT.

[1] This motion to dismiss an appeal taken from an order made by the Superior Court terminating certain proceedings to procure a transcript on an appeal from the judgment in the action upon the ground that the transcript was not filed within the period allowed by section 1, rule V, of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, and to award damages for a frivolous appeal, is a companion motion to one this day decided in Edgar et al. v. Citraro et al. (No. 7224, ante, p. 548 [ 283 P. 125], and is based upon the identical facts involved therein. As in that proceeding, appellant does not oppose the dismissal of the appeal, but resists respondents' application for damages.

For the reasons stated in that opinion it must be held here that the appeal was not frivolous, and, therefore, the motion to dismiss is granted without awarding damages.


Summaries of

Edgar v. Citraro

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Dec 16, 1929
102 Cal.App. 796 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
Case details for

Edgar v. Citraro

Case Details

Full title:JOHN F. EDGAR et al., Respondents, v. FRANK CITRARO, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One

Date published: Dec 16, 1929

Citations

102 Cal.App. 796 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
283 P. 125