From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edelstein v. Friedlander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1990
167 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 26, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Williams, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case the trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute. The extent of delay was minimal, there existed a justifiable excuse for the delay, and a sufficient affidavit of merit was provided. Moreover, the defendants have failed to allege prejudice and there is no evidence that the plaintiffs intended to abandon the case (see, Belsky v. Lowell, 117 A.D.2d 575). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Kunzeman and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Edelstein v. Friedlander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1990
167 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Edelstein v. Friedlander

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE EDELSTEIN et al., Respondents, v. DAVID FRIEDLANDER et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 500 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

Pileri v. Pileri

The matter had previously been adjourned several times at the husband's request, and the application by the…