From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edel v. Schering-Plough Grp. Benefits Plan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California San Francisco Division
Nov 2, 2011
No. C 11-2778 TEH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-2778 TEH

11-02-2011

PERRI EDEL, Plaintiff, v. SCHERING-PLOUGH GROUP BENEFITS PLAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT

MEDIATION


Mediator: Robert Luft

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Schering-Plough Corporation Group Benefits Plan, Schering-Plough Corporation and Merck & Co., Inc.'s request to excuse their party representative from attending in person the mediation scheduled for November 10, 2011 before Robert Luft is DENIED. The party representative shall appear in person in accordance with ADR L.R. 6-10(a)(1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Edel v. Schering-Plough Grp. Benefits Plan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California San Francisco Division
Nov 2, 2011
No. C 11-2778 TEH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Edel v. Schering-Plough Grp. Benefits Plan

Case Details

Full title:PERRI EDEL, Plaintiff, v. SCHERING-PLOUGH GROUP BENEFITS PLAN, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California San Francisco Division

Date published: Nov 2, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-2778 TEH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2011)