From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eddy Potash v. Harrison

U.S.
Jun 26, 1998
524 U.S. 947 (1998)

Summary

finding adverse employment action where defendant caused "temp" agency to replace plaintiff with a different temporary employee for a one week period; plaintiff was not paid for the absence until almost six months later

Summary of this case from Cartwright v. Tacala, Inc.

Opinion

No. 97-232.

June 26, 1998.


ORDER

C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Faragher v. Boca Raton, ante, p. 775. Reported below: 112 F. 3d 1437.


Summaries of

Eddy Potash v. Harrison

U.S.
Jun 26, 1998
524 U.S. 947 (1998)

finding adverse employment action where defendant caused "temp" agency to replace plaintiff with a different temporary employee for a one week period; plaintiff was not paid for the absence until almost six months later

Summary of this case from Cartwright v. Tacala, Inc.

noting that temporary employee provided sufficient legal evidence that she qualified as "employee" under Title VII in light of economic realities and common law principles

Summary of this case from Callicutt v. the Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.

remanding for further consideration of Faragher

Summary of this case from Dunegan v. City of Council Grove, Kan. Water Dept.

remanding to Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 2275, 141 L.Ed.2d 662

Summary of this case from Cadena v. Pacesetter Corp.
Case details for

Eddy Potash v. Harrison

Case Details

Full title:EDDY POTASH, INC. v. HARRISON

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 26, 1998

Citations

524 U.S. 947 (1998)
118 S. Ct. 2364

Citing Cases

Hurles v. Schriro

See Poland (Michael) v. Stewart, 117 F.3d 1094, 1105 (9th Cir. 1997) (stating that Arizona's process of…

Wabnum v. Snow

a Title VII plaintiff is not required to exhaust her employer's internal grievance procedures before filing…