From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ed Hull v. Ho Tien Le

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 28, 2021
CV 21-4089-DMG (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)

Opinion

CV 21-4089-DMG (Ex)

12-28-2021

Ed Hull v. Ho Tien Le, et al.


PROCEEDINGS: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES

Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL

HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On November 17, 2021, the Court set a Scheduling Conference. [Doc. # 30.] As required by the Court's November 17, 2021 Order, Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), and Local Rule 26-1, counsel are required to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report. To date, a Joint Rule 26(f) Report has not been filed.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties show cause in writing no later than January 7, 2022, why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to cooperate and participate with opposing counsel in a Rule 26(f) conference and for failure to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report. The filing of a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by the deadline will be deemed a satisfactory response.

Failure to timely respond to this Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution.

The scheduling conference on January 7, 2022 is hereby VACATED and will be rescheduled if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ed Hull v. Ho Tien Le

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 28, 2021
CV 21-4089-DMG (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Ed Hull v. Ho Tien Le

Case Details

Full title:Ed Hull v. Ho Tien Le, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 28, 2021

Citations

CV 21-4089-DMG (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)