From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ector Water Co. v. Easley

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 6, 1963
325 F.2d 91 (5th Cir. 1963)

Opinion

No. 20510.

December 6, 1963.

O.A. Fountain, Fleming A. Waters, Dallas, Tex., for appellant.

Lloyd Scurlock and Rawlings, Sayers, Scurlock Eidson, Fort Worth, Tex., for appellee.

Before BROWN, WISDOM and BELL, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from a judgment awarding overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1060, as amended 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201- 219. The Employer is a water supply company which furnishes water for industrial use to companies engaged in the production of goods for commerce. The successful Employee was a pump mechanic whose duties included handling of telephone calls, special requests, emergencies, and the like during "off-duty" times. The jury verdict upon which the judgment appealed from is based is amply supported by the evidence. This applies equally to the issue of required availability during times after completion of the Employee's regular tour of duty and also to the total overtime implied by the dollar and cent verdict. We have carefully considered the other specifications of error and find all to be without merit. In the circumstances of this case and also the appeal, the attorney's fee allowed by the trial court is reasonably adequate compensation so no additional sum need be awarded for services on the appeal.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ector Water Co. v. Easley

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 6, 1963
325 F.2d 91 (5th Cir. 1963)
Case details for

Ector Water Co. v. Easley

Case Details

Full title:ECTOR WATER CO., Appellant, v. Kyle L. EASLEY, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Dec 6, 1963

Citations

325 F.2d 91 (5th Cir. 1963)

Citing Cases

Wirtz v. Thompson Packers, Inc.

Lewis v. Times Pub. Co., 185 F.2d 457 (5 Cir. 1950); Olearchick v. American Steel Foundries, 73 F. Supp. 273…

Wirtz v. Harrigill

These decisions, following the principles emphatically announced in Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.,…