From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eckstein v. O'Malley

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Aug 28, 2024
Civ. 2:24-cv-00002-KRS (D.N.M. Aug. 28, 2024)

Opinion

Civ. 2:24-cv-00002-KRS

08-28-2024

STACEY ALMEDA ECKSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

RICHARD W. PRUETT Special Assistant United States Attorney KATHERINE O'NEAL Attorney for Plaintiff


RICHARD W. PRUETT Special Assistant United States Attorney

KATHERINE O'NEAL Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER FOR EXTENSION

HONORABLE KEVIN R. SWEAZEA, United States Magistrate Judge

Upon consideration of Defendant's Second Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time (Doc. 21) to file a response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and Remand Administrative Agency Decision, with Memorandum of Law in Support (Doc. 18), the Court having reviewed the motion and being otherwise fully advised, FINDS that the motion is well taken and is GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant shall have until October 3, 2024, to file a response, and that the date by which Plaintiff may file a reply, if any, be extended by fourteen (14) days, after Defendant files his brief.


Summaries of

Eckstein v. O'Malley

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Aug 28, 2024
Civ. 2:24-cv-00002-KRS (D.N.M. Aug. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Eckstein v. O'Malley

Case Details

Full title:STACEY ALMEDA ECKSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Aug 28, 2024

Citations

Civ. 2:24-cv-00002-KRS (D.N.M. Aug. 28, 2024)