From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eckard v. Ingelheim

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 19, 2024
22-cv-01725-SK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2024)

Opinion

22-cv-01725-SK

11-19-2024

ANAHITA ECKARD, Plaintiff, v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM, Defendant.


ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL REGARDING DOCKET NO. 29

SALLIE KIM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The parties filed a joint status report informing the Court that they settled this matter in the arbitration proceedings but did not request that this case be dismissed. In light of the settlement, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court within thirty days, with proof of service, that the settlement was not consummated or that the agreed consideration for settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated, and this case shall be restored to the calendar. If no certification is filed, after passage of thirty days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Eckard v. Ingelheim

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Nov 19, 2024
22-cv-01725-SK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Eckard v. Ingelheim

Case Details

Full title:ANAHITA ECKARD, Plaintiff, v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Nov 19, 2024

Citations

22-cv-01725-SK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2024)