From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Echols v. Miqueo

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Sep 4, 2024
7:24-CV-69 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 4, 2024)

Opinion

7:24-CV-69 (WLS)

09-04-2024

DANNY ECHOLS, Plaintiff, v. EMANUEL CASTILLO MIQUEO JOEL LASTRE GUZMAN, and HB CAR CARRIER, INC, Defendants.


ORDER

W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE.

Before the Court is Defendant Emanuel Castillo Miqueo's (“Defendant Miqueo”) Motion to Stay (Doc. 4) (“the Motion”). Therein, Defendant Miqueo asks the Court to stay the above-captioned case pending the resolution of Universal Casualty Risk Retention Group's (“Universal”) application to be placed in “receivership and to issue an injunction.” (Doc. 4 at 1-2). The Response period has passed with no response from Plaintiff. The Court, however, finds it necessary for Plaintiff to state his position on the Record regarding the Motion. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a response to Defendant's Miqueo's Motion to Stay (Doc. 4) no later than Wednesday, September 11, 2024. Thereafter, the Court will address the Motion.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Echols v. Miqueo

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Sep 4, 2024
7:24-CV-69 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Echols v. Miqueo

Case Details

Full title:DANNY ECHOLS, Plaintiff, v. EMANUEL CASTILLO MIQUEO JOEL LASTRE GUZMAN…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia

Date published: Sep 4, 2024

Citations

7:24-CV-69 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 4, 2024)