From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Echols v. Heideman, McKay

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Oct 26, 2010
400 F. App'x 320 (10th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-4118.

October 26, 2010.

Before HARTZ, ANDERSON, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.


ORDER


William L. Echols filed a complaint of attorney misconduct in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. The district court dismissed the complaint. Mr. Echols has filed a notice of appeal from that decision.

This court has held that "[a] private citizen does not have standing to initiate or maintain a disciplinary proceeding, or to appeal if a court declines to discipline an attorney." In re Lynn, 505 F.3d 1323, 1324 (10th Cir. 2007). Because Mr. Echols lacks standing to challenge on appeal the dismissal of his attorney-misconduct complaint, this appeal is DISMISSED. The pending "Appellant's Application For Relief is also DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Echols v. Heideman, McKay

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Oct 26, 2010
400 F. App'x 320 (10th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Echols v. Heideman, McKay

Case Details

Full title:William L. ECHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ASCIONE, HEIDEMAN McKAY; Justin…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Oct 26, 2010

Citations

400 F. App'x 320 (10th Cir. 2010)