From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Echols v. Autauga Cnty.

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Sep 21, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv265-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Sep. 21, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv265-MHT (WO)

09-21-2015

SCHYLER LEE ECHOLS, Plaintiff, v. AUTAUGA COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 23) is adopted.

(2) The claims against defendants Ricky Causey and LeLarry Smith are dismissed without prejudice and said defendants are terminated as parties.

(3) The motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 23) is granted as to the claims against defendants Autauga County, Larry Nixon, and David Lyles (aka David Liles).

(4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants Autauga County, Larry Nixon, and David Lyles and against plaintiff Schyler Lee Echols, with plaintiff Echols taking nothing by his complaint.

(5) No costs are taxed.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 21st day of September, 2015.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Echols v. Autauga Cnty.

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Sep 21, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv265-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Sep. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Echols v. Autauga Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:SCHYLER LEE ECHOLS, Plaintiff, v. AUTAUGA COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 21, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv265-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Sep. 21, 2015)