Opinion
December 19, 2000.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered February 4, 2000, which,inter alia, denied plaintiff's motion to set aside the parties' child support agreement, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Stephen David Fink, for plaintiff-appellant.
Before: Lerner, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Buckley, Friedman, JJ.
The subject child support agreement was fair and reasonable at the time it was entered into (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][3]), and should not be set aside as noncompliant with Domestic Relations Law § 240(1-b)(h) for having incorrectly stated that, under the Child Support Standards Act, plaintiff's basic child support obligation for the parties' two children would have been 20% or 25% of the parties' combined income. We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them to be unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.