From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Echevarria v. Sadker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 21, 2013
106 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-05-21

Marisol ECHEVARRIA, as Administratrix of the Estate of David Barriera, etc., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Robin SADKER, M.D., et al., Defendants, Beth Israel Medical Center, Defendant–Appellant.

McAloon & Friedman, P.C., New York (Gina Bernardi Di Folco of counsel), for appellant. Leav & Steinberg, LLP, New York (Philip R. Papa of counsel), for respondent.



McAloon & Friedman, P.C., New York (Gina Bernardi Di Folco of counsel), for appellant. Leav & Steinberg, LLP, New York (Philip R. Papa of counsel), for respondent.
MAZZARELLI, J.P., SWEENY, FREEDMAN, GISCHE, JJ.

Amended order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley B. Green, J.), entered June 7, 2012, which, after a hearing, denied defendant Beth Israel Medical Center's motion to change venue from Bronx County to New York County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In opposition to defendant's prima facie showing that plaintiff resided in Orange County, based, inter alia, on her verified answer in another action, plaintiff raised issues of fact warranting a hearing by submitting a detailed affidavit explaining that, after her husband died in November 2009, she went to live with her sister and brother-in-law in Orange County, and that since January 2010, when she returned to work in New York County, she had also resided on weekdays in an apartment they maintained in Bronx County, so that she would have a shorter commute to work. In addition, plaintiff submitted supporting affidavits from her roommate and her sister and brother-in-law, and some documentation. The record also contains plaintiff's verified petition for issuance of letters of administration, which lists the Bronx County address as her residence. Since a party may have two residences for venue purposes ( seeCPLR 503[a] ), and plaintiff's submissions raised factual issues dependent on credibility determinations as to her claimed residence in the Bronx, the motion court properly held a hearing on the issue ( see Collins v. Glenwood Mgt. Corp., 25 A.D.3d 447, 810 N.Y.S.2d 17 [1st Dept. 2006] ).

We find no basis for disturbing the court's finding, made after the hearing, that plaintiff was a bona fide Bronx County resident when she commenced this action ( see Blake v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co., 22 A.D.3d 230, 803 N.Y.S.2d 8 [1st Dept. 2005] ).


Summaries of

Echevarria v. Sadker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 21, 2013
106 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Echevarria v. Sadker

Case Details

Full title:Marisol ECHEVARRIA, as Administratrix of the Estate of David Barriera…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 21, 2013

Citations

106 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
106 A.D.3d 567
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 3600

Citing Cases

Orellana v. 115 Enters. Grp.

There is no basis for disturbing the court's findings, made after the hearing, that plaintiff changed his…