Opinion
February 4, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rader, J.).
Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and application dismissed.
Petitioner has no proprietary interest in the subpoenaed documents and, therefore, does not have standing to challenge a subpoena served on a third party ( see, 38-14 Realty Corp. v New York City Dept. of Consumer Affairs, 103 A.D.2d 804). Lazer, J.P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.