Echeguren v. Citibank, N.A.

Full title: Silvana ECHEGUREN, et al., Appellants, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Feb 27, 2014

133 So. 3d 1174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 4D13–2931.

2014-02-27

Silvana ECHEGUREN, et al., Appellants, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jack B. Tuter, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 08–4269812. Silvana Echeguren, Fort Lauderdale, pro se. Kathleen E. Angione and Roy A. Diaz of SHD Legal Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jack B. Tuter, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 08–4269812.
Silvana Echeguren, Fort Lauderdale, pro se. Kathleen E. Angione and Roy A. Diaz of SHD Legal Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

This cause is summarily affirmed under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315, as the initial brief fails to present a preliminary basis for reversal. Specifically, the issues raised in the appellants' brief relate to the 2009 final judgment of foreclosure and appellants' motion to vacate same. The issues do not relate to the order resetting foreclosure sale, which is the subject of appellants' notice of appeal.

Affirmed. STEVENSON, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.