From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Echazabal v. El Toro Meat Packing Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 5, 1987
506 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-2195.

May 5, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Mario P. Goderich, J.

Harold C. Culmer, Miami, for appellant.

Usich Sullivan and David L. Sullivan, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.


We affirm the summary judgment entered in favor of El Toro Meat Packing Corp. and against Alberto Echazabal, a security guard employed by an independent contractor, upon a holding that the employee of an independent contractor cannot maintain a cause of action against a property owner where, as here, the precise duty for which he was employed (guarding the premises) resulted in his injury. See McCarty v. Dade Div. of American Hosp. Supply, 360 So.2d 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). Echazabal has remedies under Chapter 440, Florida Statutes, against his employer, the independent contractor.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Echazabal v. El Toro Meat Packing Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 5, 1987
506 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Echazabal v. El Toro Meat Packing Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ALBERTO ECHAZABAL, APPELLANT, v. EL TORO MEAT PACKING CORP., D/B/A…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 5, 1987

Citations

506 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Young v. Bob Howard Automotive, Inc.

Id. at ¶ 16, 512 P.2d at 186 (quoting Vecchio v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 328 F.2d 714, 718 (2d Cir. 1964)). See…

Walker v. Mathis

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Parrish v. Matthews, 548 So.2d 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Echazabal v. El Toro Meat…