Opinion
2:22-cv-01553-CDS-VCF
10-07-2022
EBET, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff(s), v. JASON FINCH, an Individual, Defendant(s).
Michael C. Van, Esq., (#3876) Garrett R. Chase., Esq., (14498) SHUMWAY VAN Farhad Novian, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Alexander Kandel, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Alexander B. Gura, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) NOVIAN & NOVIAN, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Christian Gabroy, Esq., (#8805) Kaine Messer, Esq., (#14240) GABROY | MESSER The District at Green Valley Ranch Attorneys for Defendant
Michael C. Van, Esq., (#3876) Garrett R. Chase., Esq., (14498) SHUMWAY VAN Farhad Novian, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Alexander Kandel, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Alexander B. Gura, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) NOVIAN & NOVIAN, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff
Christian Gabroy, Esq., (#8805) Kaine Messer, Esq., (#14240) GABROY | MESSER The District at Green Valley Ranch Attorneys for Defendant
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT JASON FINCH
(FIRST REQUEST)
Cam Ferenbach, United States Magistrate Judge
It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff EBET, Inc., (“Plaintiff”) through its counsel Michael C. Van, Esq., Garret R. Chase, Esq., of Shumway Van along with Farhad Novian, Esq., Alexander B. Gura, Esq., Alexander Kandel, Esq., of Novian & Novian, LLP and Defendant Jason Finch, (“Defendant”) through his counsel Christian Gabroy, Esq. and Kaine Messer, Esq. of Gabroy | Messer, shall have an extension up to and including October 21, 2022, for Defendant to file his responsive pleading. This stipulation is submitted per LR IA 6-1 and based upon the following:
1. The Plaintiff filed its Complaint on or about September 15, 2022, in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Case No. 2:22-cv-01553-CDS-VCF. The summons was served on or about September 16, 2022.
2. The Defendant's responsive pleading is currently due on or about October 7, 2022.
3. This is the first request for an extension of time for the Defendant to file his responsive pleading.
4. This request for extension is made in good faith, with good cause, and not for the purpose of delay but rather due to the recency of our retention and conducting due diligence. Further, Defendant's counsel has requested this extension from Plaintiff as prior work and personal commitments have caused this necessary requested extension.
5. Nothing in this Stipulation, nor the fact of entering to the same, shall be construed as waiving any claim and/or defense held by any party.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.