As to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, based on SLADEN evidence and Plaintiffs opposition, a trier of fact could find that it applies. Plaintiff submits an expert affidavit based on more than just deposition testimony (NYSCEF Doc 148 ("Carrajat Aff") (see Ebalo v Trustees of Columbia Univ., 192 A.D.3d 626 [1st Dept 2021]; McLaughlin v Thyssen Dover El. Co., 117 A.D.3d 511 [1st Dept 2014]), stating that the freight elevator doors closed on Plaintiff due to the detector not working and SLADE had notice of similar problems with the same elevator doors (Carrajat Aff. ΒΆ 12). Carrajat states that there is no evidence that the detector itself or the various cables connected to the detector's control box were checked by SLADE (id.).