From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eaton v. Mont. Silversmiths

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Oct 16, 2018
CV 18-65-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Oct. 16, 2018)

Opinion

CV 18-65-BLG-SPW

10-16-2018

ROBERT A. EATON, Plaintiff, v. MONTANA SILVERSMITHS, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff Robert Eaton, appearing pro se, has moved for Application of Entry of Default. (Doc. 8). Pending before the Court are United States Magistrate Judge Timothy Cavan's findings and recommendations on Eaton's Application. (Doc. 9). Judge Cavan recommends this Court deny Eaton's Application for failing to demonstrate that he properly served Montana Silversmiths. (Doc. 9 at 3). Eaton filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations, entitling him to de novo review. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

In his objection, Eaton asserts that during the Montana Human Rights Bureau investigation, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission advised him to direct his correspondence to Montana Silversmiths through its attorney, Jessica Fehr, at Moulton Bellingham, Longo & Mather. (Doc. 10). When he contacted Moulton Bellingham, attorney Joseph Soveidi advised him that Ms. Fehr had become a judge and that Mr. Soveidi had taken over her files. (Id.). Mr. Soveidi acknowledged that he was counsel for Montana Silversmiths. (Id.). Accordinly, Eaton asserts that he properly served Montana Silversmiths and appropriately followed Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h), as evidenced by his May 25, 2018 Return of Service indicating that the summons and amended complaint was served on Joseph Soveidi, attorney at Moulton, Bellingham, Longo & Mather. (Doc. 7).

Unfortunately for Eaton, however, simply because Joseph Soveidi is Montana Silversmiths' attorney to whom correspondence should be directed, does not mean he is the "officer, [] managing or general agent, or . . . agent authorized by appointment or law to receive service of process." See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h). As Judge Cavan noted, Eaton failed to set forth the details of service authorizing Moulton Bellingham Longo & Mather to receive service on Montana Silversmiths' behalf. Without a showing that Moulton Bellingham Long Mather was a legally correct recipient of service under 4(h), this Court may not find proper service, and default cannot be entered.

IT IS ORDERED the proposed findings and recommendations entered by United States Magistrate Judge Cavan (Doc. 9) are ADOPTED IN FULL.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Eaton's Application (Doc. 8) is DENIED.

DATED this 16th day of October, 2018.

/s/_________

SUSAN P. WATTERS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Eaton v. Mont. Silversmiths

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Oct 16, 2018
CV 18-65-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Oct. 16, 2018)
Case details for

Eaton v. Mont. Silversmiths

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT A. EATON, Plaintiff, v. MONTANA SILVERSMITHS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 16, 2018

Citations

CV 18-65-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Oct. 16, 2018)