From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eaton v. Hungerford

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Mar 18, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1614 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

186 CA 15-00048.

03-18-2016

Faye M. EATON, Plaintiff–Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sylvia HUNGERFORD, Individually and as Special Education Teacher of Wayne Central School District, Wayne Central School District, Board of Education of Wayne Central School District, Frank Robusto, Individually and as President of Wayne Central School District Board of Education, Joyce Lyke, Individually and as Vice President of Wayne Central School District Board of Education, John Triou, Individually and as Member of Wayne Central School District Board of Education, Richard Johnson, Individually and as Member of Wayne Central School District Board of Education, Jeff Schultz, Individually and as Member of Wayne Central School District Board of Education, Scott Griswold, Individually and as Member of Wayne Central School District Board of Education, Mark Wyse, Individually and as Member of Wayne Central School District Board of Education, Susan Newman, Individually and as Member of Wayne Central School District Board of Education, Tom Nicholson, Individually and as Member of Wayne Central School District Board of Education, Robert Armocida, Individually and as Wayne Central School District Middle School Principal, Michael Havens, Individually and as Wayne Central School District Superintendent, and Mark Callahan, Individually and as Wayne Central School District Director of Human Resources, Defendants–Respondents.

Law Office of Emmelyn Logan–Baldwin, Rochester (Emmelyn Logan–Baldwin of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Appellant. Smith, Sovik, Kendrick & Sugnet, P.C., Syracuse (Edward J. Smith, III, of Counsel), for Defendants–Respondents.


Law Office of Emmelyn Logan–Baldwin, Rochester (Emmelyn Logan–Baldwin of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Appellant.

Smith, Sovik, Kendrick & Sugnet, P.C., Syracuse (Edward J. Smith, III, of Counsel), for Defendants–Respondents.

Opinion

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, and TROUTMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Eaton v. Hungerford

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Mar 18, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1614 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Eaton v. Hungerford

Case Details

Full title:FAYE M. EATON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. SYLVIA…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Mar 18, 2016

Citations

137 A.D.3d 1614 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1963
26 N.Y.S.3d 901