From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eaton v. Engert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

January, 1930.

Present — Sears, P.J., Crouch, Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.


Plaintiffs' exceptions sustained and motion for new trial granted, with costs to plaintiffs to abide the event, upon the ground that the obligation for commission arose upon the date of the signing of the contract of exchange ( Reis Co. v. Zimmerli, 224 N.Y. 351) and the indebtedness of the defendant Bessie Engert to the plaintiffs was, therefore, precedent to the giving and accepting of the note of the defendant Morris Engert, and such note, in the absence of proof to the contrary, was given and accepted as collateral security only. ( Dibble v. Richardson, 171 N.Y. 131.) All concur.


Summaries of

Eaton v. Engert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Eaton v. Engert

Case Details

Full title:W.G. EATON and JOHN H. CONIFF, Appellants, v. MORRIS ENGERT and BESSIE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1930

Citations

228 App. Div. 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)