Eaton v. Bank of America

Full title: BRENDA EATON and GEORGE R. SHADIE, Plaintiffs v. BANK OF AMERICA f/k/a…

Court: United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 2, 2007

CIVIL NO. 3:CV-07-328 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 3:CV-07-328.

July 2, 2007

ORDER

EDWIN KOSIK, Senior District Judge

AND NOW, this 2^nd day of July, 2007, IT APPEARING TO THE COURT THAT:

(1) Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their complaint on June 1, 2007;

(2) Plaintiffs failed to file the proposed amended complaint as an attachment to the motion as required by M.D.Pa. Local Rule 15.1;

(3) No certificate of concurrence or non-concurrence was attached to the motion as required by M.D.Pa. Local Rule 7.1;

(4) Moreover, no brief was filed in support of the motion as required by M.D.Pa. Local Rule 7.5;

(5) On June 18, 2007, defendant filed an opposition to plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend the complaint;

(6) In the opposition, defendant raises the plaintiffs' failure to file a certificate of concurrence, failure to file a supporting brief and failure to attach the proposed amended complaint;

(7) We find that plaintiffs have failed to comply with M.D.Pa. Local Rules 15.1, 7.1 and 7.5;

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend the complaint (Doc. 8) is DEEMED WITHDRAWN.