From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eaton v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Dec 9, 2010
3:10CV00075 JTR (E.D. Ark. Dec. 9, 2010)

Opinion

3:10CV00075 JTR.

December 9, 2010


ORDER


The Commissioner has filed an unopposed Motion (docket entry #17) to reverse the ALJ's decision and to remand this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1995):

The court shall have the power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.

The Commissioner seeks remand for further development of the record and for the ALJ to issue a new decision. Under these circumstances, a sentence four remand is appropriate. See Buckner v. Apfel, 213 F.3d 1006, 1010-11 (8th Cir. 2000).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Defendant's Motion to Remand (docket entry #17) is GRANTED. This is a remand pursuant to "sentence four" of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

DATED this 9th day of December, 2010.


Summaries of

Eaton v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Dec 9, 2010
3:10CV00075 JTR (E.D. Ark. Dec. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Eaton v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LAURA EATON PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division

Date published: Dec 9, 2010

Citations

3:10CV00075 JTR (E.D. Ark. Dec. 9, 2010)