From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eatman v. Lynfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 1998
251 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 22, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion for summary judgment, as questions of fact exist as to whether an attorney-client relationship existed between him and the plaintiffs, and as to his degree of involvement, if any, in the alleged fraud (see, LaManna v. Cahn Wollen Co., 249 A.D.2d 451; Messena v. Manhattan Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 249 A.D.2d 280).

Copertino, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Eatman v. Lynfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 1998
251 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Eatman v. Lynfield

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES EATMAN et al., Respondents, v. DAVID LYNFIELD et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 926