Opinion
June 22, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion for summary judgment, as questions of fact exist as to whether an attorney-client relationship existed between him and the plaintiffs, and as to his degree of involvement, if any, in the alleged fraud (see, LaManna v. Cahn Wollen Co., 249 A.D.2d 451; Messena v. Manhattan Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 249 A.D.2d 280).
Copertino, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Friedmann, JJ., concur.