From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eastin v. City of New Orleans

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 8, 1973
475 F.2d 191 (5th Cir. 1973)

Opinion

No. 72-3350. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

March 8, 1973.

Kenneth J. Berke, New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Byron P. Legendre, Asst. Dist. Atty., Charles Foti, Jr., New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and DYER and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.



After viewing a film entitled "Deep Throat" an officer of the New Orleans Police Department made a detailed affidavit for a search warrant of the motion picture house for the purpose of seizing and confiscating the film prints as being obscene. A judge of the municipal court issued the warrant without holding a prior adversary hearing. Not only were prints of the film taken but check stubs, personnel records, and an address book were also seized. Two employees, Eastin and Brazier, arrested for contributing to the delinquency of a minor, and the owner of the theater brought suit in the district court for the return of property, for an injunction from interfering with the exhibition of the picture or other films, and for an order suppressing the use by the defendants of any material seized in any proceeding against Eastin and Brazier.

At the hearing before the district court the defendants offered to return to the plaintiffs everything seized except one print of the film which they desired to retain for use as evidence in the State court proceeding against Eastin and Brazier, for contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile and not for the purpose of confiscating the print as obscene. The district court made this tender a part of the record and, finding no bad faith harassment in connection with the State court prosecution, denied the plaintiffs injunctive relief against further proceedings in the State court. The court took under advisement the defendant's motion to dismiss. This appeal ensued.

We are convinced that the plaintiffs have failed to make any showing of bad faith, harassment or any other unusual circumstance that would call for equitable relief. Younger v. Harris, 1971, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Eastin v. City of New Orleans

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 8, 1973
475 F.2d 191 (5th Cir. 1973)
Case details for

Eastin v. City of New Orleans

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH EASTIN ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS ET…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Mar 8, 1973

Citations

475 F.2d 191 (5th Cir. 1973)

Citing Cases

Sovereign News Co. v. Falke

1967) (two judges holding that "there is no express authority one way or the other, the court is of the…