From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eastern Exterminating Co., Inc. v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1985
109 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 25, 1985


Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs.

After a hearing, respondent found that petitioners violated State regulations by misapplying the pesticide chlordane in 16 separate instances in which homes in Nassau and Suffolk Counties became contaminated as a result. The respondent Commissioner thereafter revoked the registration and certification of petitioners for commercial pesticide application.

Substantial evidence supports the determination of the Commissioner ( Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222). The penalty of revocation was not disproportionate in light of the serious risk to public health and safety caused by petitioners' irresponsible and reckless conduct ( Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., supra). Petitioners' procedural objections are without merit. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Eastern Exterminating Co., Inc. v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1985
109 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Eastern Exterminating Co., Inc. v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:EASTERN EXTERMINATING CO., INC., et al., Petitioners, v. HENRY G…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1985

Citations

109 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)