From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

East v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Mar 6, 2001
38 S.W.3d 495 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 58226

March 6, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BUCHANAN COUNTY, HONORABLE PATRICK K. ROBB, JUDGE

Ronald E. Partee Kansas City, Missouri and Ross C. Nigro, for appellant[s]

Stacy L. Anderson Jefferson City, Missouri, for respondent[s]

Before: James M. Smart, Jr., Presiding Judge, Joseph M. Ellis, Judge and Laura D. Stith, Judge


O R D E R


Byron L. East appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

East v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Mar 6, 2001
38 S.W.3d 495 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

East v. State

Case Details

Full title:BYRON L. EAST, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Mar 6, 2001

Citations

38 S.W.3d 495 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)