From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

East v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 8, 1991
583 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 91-201.

August 8, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County; George A. Sprinkel, IV, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David G. Mersch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


We affirm on authority of Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) and certify the same question we certified in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990):

DO FLORIDA'S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

East v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 8, 1991
583 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

East v. State

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL KEITH EAST, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 8, 1991

Citations

583 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)