From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

East v. Earls

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 29, 2018
548 S.W.3d 452 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 80788

05-29-2018

Byron L. EAST, Appellant, v. Alan EARLS, et al., Respondents.

Byron L. East, Licking, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Reschly, Jefferson City, for respondent.


Byron L. East, Licking, Appellant Pro Se.

Joel Reschly, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

ORDER

Per Curiam

Byron East appeals the circuit court's judgment dismissing his lawsuit against Alan Earls, Jay Cassady, Donna Cayer, Raina Martin, Jackie Petri, Laura Sanning, and Hugh Kirkley. He contends the court erred in determining that his petition failed to state a claim for conversion and in failing to advise that he could amend the petition. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

East v. Earls

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 29, 2018
548 S.W.3d 452 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

East v. Earls

Case Details

Full title:Byron L. EAST, Appellant, v. Alan EARLS, et al., Respondents.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: May 29, 2018

Citations

548 S.W.3d 452 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)