Opinion
No. 2358.
Argued March 23, 1959.
Decided May 1, 1959.
Ethelbert B. Frey, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Ted D. Kuemmerling, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., with whom Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, Hubert B. Pair, and Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corp. Counsel Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent.
Before ROVER, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.
Petitioner, as the result of his conviction of various moving traffic violations, accumulated over twelve "points" and after due administrative proceedings his operator's permit was revoked.
See Part V, Traffic and Motor Vehicle Regulations.
All of the questions raised by petitioner in his appeal have heretofore been decided by this court adversely to his contentions.
See Glenn v. Commissioners of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 146 A.2d 575; Tillman v. Director of Vehicles, etc., D.C.Mun.App., 144 A.2d 922; Daniels v. Director of Vehicles and Traffic of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 143 A.2d 95; Ritch v. Director of Vehicles and Traffic of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 124 A.2d 301; Lambert v. Board of Com'rs of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 116 A.2d 926.
Affirmed.