From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

East N Y Sav. Bank v. Alston

Supreme Court, Queens County
Oct 25, 1989
145 Misc. 2d 540 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1989)

Opinion

October 25, 1989

Stockschlaeder McDonald for plaintiff. Joshua Rosenberg for defendants.


The plaintiff has moved for summary judgment and other relief.

On October 29, 1984, defendant Edmon Alston and defendant Alberta Alston executed two retail installment obligations in the amounts of $12,000 and $18,000 for the purpose of improving their home. In order to finance the improvements, the defendants executed two mortgages on their home to Northeastern Holding Co., Inc. The plaintiff, the eventual assignee of these mortgages, alleges that the defendants have defaulted on their monthly payments from June 1988. The plaintiff has elected to accelerate the amount due under the mortgages and to foreclose.

The defendants have resisted the entry of summary judgment on the ground that necessary parties are allegedly absent. The defendants have contended that the eight children of defendant Edmon Alston and his former wife are necessary parties because they inherited part of the property after the former wife died. There in no merit in this contention. First, RPAPL 1311 provides that necessary defendants are those "whose interests is claimed to be subject and subordinate to the plaintiff's lien". The eight children received their alleged interest upon the death of the former wife, which was prior in time to the execution of the mortgages. If the children have an interest in the subject premises, it is superior, not subordinate, to the plaintiff's interest. Second, "[t]he rule is well established that the only proper parties to a foreclosure action `are the mortgagee and mortgagor and those who have acquired rights under them subsequent to the mortgage.'" (Stevens v Breen, 258 App. Div. 423, 425, affd 283 N.Y. 196, quoting Jacobie v Mickle, 144 N.Y. 237, 239.) Third, questions of adverse title are generally not determined within a mortgage foreclosure action. (Stevens v Breen, supra; 78 N.Y. Jur 2d, Mortgages, § 608.) "As a general rule, a person setting up a claim of title to the mortgaged premises adverse and paramount to that of the mortgagor, and not derived from him, is not a proper party to the foreclosure suit, as he has no interest in the subject matter of the action". (59 CJS, Mortgages, § 627 [b].)

Accordingly, that branch of the motion which is for summary judgment is granted. That branch of the motion which is for the appointment of a Referee to compute the amount due on the mortgage, etc., is also granted.

Settle order.


Summaries of

East N Y Sav. Bank v. Alston

Supreme Court, Queens County
Oct 25, 1989
145 Misc. 2d 540 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1989)
Case details for

East N Y Sav. Bank v. Alston

Case Details

Full title:EAST NEW YORK SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff, v. EDMON ALSTON et al., Defendants

Court:Supreme Court, Queens County

Date published: Oct 25, 1989

Citations

145 Misc. 2d 540 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1989)
547 N.Y.S.2d 198

Citing Cases

Courchevel 1850 LLC v. 464 Ovington LLC

And while Plaintiff is a necessary party to the state court proceeding, Deutsche Bank, as a senior…

Bank of Am., N.A. v. Germain

gage (see, RPAPL § 1321; Green Tree Servicing, LLC v Cary, 106 AD3d 691, 965 NYS2d 511 [2d Dept 2013]; Ocwen…