From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eason v. Clarity Servs.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 21, 2022
2:22-cv-01387-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01387-JCM-NJK

12-21-2022

Jimmy Eason Jr., Plaintiff, v. Clarity Services, Inc. et al, Defendants.

Michael Kind, Esq. Nevada Bar No.: 13903 Kind Law Attorney for Plaintiff Jimmy Eason Jr. WRIGHT, FINLAY,&ZAK, LLP Ramir Hernandez, Esq. Attorney for Defendant 2233 Paradise Road, LLC dba Cash Factory USA


Michael Kind, Esq. Nevada Bar No.: 13903 Kind Law Attorney for Plaintiff Jimmy Eason Jr.

WRIGHT, FINLAY,&ZAK, LLP Ramir Hernandez, Esq. Attorney for Defendant 2233 Paradise Road, LLC dba Cash Factory USA

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY ACTION

Jimmy Eason Jr. (“Plaintiff”) and 2233 Paradise Road, LLC dba Cash Factory USA (“Defendant) (jointly as “the parties”) stipulate to arbitrate their dispute in AAA. The parties therefore stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiff will arbitrate his claims through private arbitration.

2. This action is stayed pending the arbitration proceedings between the parties.

3. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss is moot as of the filing of this stipulation. ECF No. 19.

4. Plaintiff's motion to stay case is moot as of the filing of this stipulation. ECF No. 20.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Eason v. Clarity Servs.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 21, 2022
2:22-cv-01387-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Eason v. Clarity Servs.

Case Details

Full title:Jimmy Eason Jr., Plaintiff, v. Clarity Services, Inc. et al, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 21, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01387-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 21, 2022)